The Knee
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 51-54, January 2007

Conventional radiography cannot replace CT scanning in detecting tibial tubercle lateralisation

  • Frank-Christiaan B.M. Wagenaar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 24 3659290; fax: +31 24 3659698.
  • ,
  • Sander Koëter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Patricia G. Anderson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research, Development and Education, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ate B. Wymenga

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 13 April 2006; received in revised form 11 October 2006; accepted 12 October 2006. published online 06 December 2006.

Abstract 

Patellar instability can be caused by an excessive lateral distance between the anterior tibial tubercle and the trochlear groove (TT–TG). This study was designed to compare the TT–TG in reformatted computed tomography to the TT–TG on a 30° axial conventional radiograph (CR) using lead markers to visualize the tibial tubercle and epicondyles. This is the first report on the use of lead markers for determining the TT–TG. Seven symptomatic knees in five patients (mean age 25 years, standard deviation 8.0 years) were investigated. Results showed that the tibial tubercle could be detected on 30° axial CR by a lead marker. Determining the TT–TG however proved to be difficult. A good intra- and interobserver reliability (ICC >0.86) but large measurement error for the axial CR compared to CT was measured (Limits of Reproducibility as quantification of the measurement error was 18 mm for axial CR and 4 mm for CT).

Because of the large measurement error for axial CR, the study was terminated after seven symptomatic knees. Positioning of the patient and markers, especially the tibial tubercle marker, probably are important factors leading to the large measurement error. Therefore, axial CR cannot replace CT to detect a pathological tubercle trochlear groove distance.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Knee, Patellar instability, Radiography, Tibial tubercle

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0968-0160(06)00167-0

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2006.10.009

The Knee
Volume 14, Issue 1 , Pages 51-54, January 2007