Journal Home
Search for

Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 59-62 (January 2007)


View previous. 15 of 22 View next.

A new operative procedure using a Küntcher nail for a periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture after revision total knee arthroplasty: A case report

Yoshitaka TanakaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Tatsuo Kobayashi, Motoki Ohashi, Daiki Kaneko, Koichi Nemoto

Received 29 July 2006; received in revised form 27 October 2006; accepted 30 October 2006. published online 14 December 2006.

Abstract 

Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are difficult surgical problems. We report a case of an 84-year-old female, in which an original method was applied to treat a periprosthetic supracondylar femoral nonunion just proximal a femoral component. The new method features extending the stem of the femoral component with a Küntcher nail. Eventually bony union was obtained and the patient is now able to walk without any support.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Case report

2. Discussion

References

Copyright

1. Case report 

return to Article Outline

An 84-year-old female patient who had osteoarthritis of both knees underwent a left total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in our institution in 1982. The implants were removed because of infection in 1988. After the infection subsided, she underwent revision TKA with cement using a revision type Porous Coating Anatomic prosthesis (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) in 1990. In 2001, she fell down and sustained a displaced supracondylar femoral fracture of the ipsilateral side adjacent to the femoral implant (Fig. 1). Therefore, the fracture was fixed with a condylar buttress plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA) (Fig. 2). However, despite weightbearing restriction, the patient bore full weight immediately after the operation, and the fracture displaced two months postoperatively. She was conservatively treated using a knee–ankle–foot orthosis and without weight bearing, but finally the screws were broken and the fracture resulted in nonunion (Fig. 3). We treated the nonunion by our originally devised method using a 16 mm-diameter Küntcher nail in 2004. We removed the broken screws and plate used in the previous operation and debrided the nonunion site, and we found both the femoral and tibial components fixed firmly. The proximal end of 16 mm Küntcher nail was cut preoperatively to connect with the stem of the femoral component and a hole made for locking screw at the distal end. The nail was inserted retrogradely from the nonunion site, and then connected to the stem. One locking screw was used to lock the nail. The nonunion was fixed firmly at the operation. An autogenous iliac bone graft was added to promote union.


View full-size image.

Fig. 1. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the supracondylar femoral fracture above the total knee arthroplasty.



View full-size image.

Fig. 2. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the knee after an open reduction and internal fixation with a condylar buttress plate.



View full-size image.

Fig. 3. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the supracondylar femoral nonunion before re-operation. Screw were broken and the fracture site was dislocated.


Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy was additionally performed postoperatively. She began partial weight bearing at 6 weeks postoperatively and progressed to full weight bearing. At final follow up, one and one-half years after the re-operation, the nonunion had healed (Fig. 4), and the patient was able to walk without any support. The range of motion of her left knee was 0–70°, it was the same as preoperation. Her left quadriceps muscle strength was grade 4 with the manual muscle test.


View full-size image.

Fig. 4. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs 1 year and 5 months after our originally devised treatment. A 16 mm-diameter Küntcher nail fits the stem of the femoral components firmly and the nonunion site successfully healed.


2. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Conventional treatments available for periprosthetic femoral fractures without loosening of components include casting, external fixation, plate, flexible intramedullary nail, and retrograde intramedullary nail [1]. For those with loosening of components, the options include revision arthroplasty with a long-stemmed femoral component, a custom-made component, a tumor prosthesis, and an allograft-implant composite [1].

The retrograde intramedullary nail has several advantages compared with plate fixation including decreased operative time, better access to the fracture site without periosteal stripping, minimum disturbance of the fracture hematoma and more rigid fixation [1]. Therefore, some recent reports have recommended retrograde intramedullary nail fixation [2], [3], [4], but some implants such as those with posterior stabilized femoral components with closed housings or long-stemmed femoral components can not accommodate this method [1], [5]. At the time of the patient's first supracondylar femoral fracture, we considered using a retrograde intramedullary nail, but this could not be accommodated by her femoral component, because it had a stem and closed housing. So, the fracture was fixed with a buttress condylar plate.

Treatment options for the nonunion included external fixation, flexible intramedullary nail, revision total knee arthroplasty, and the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plate fixation. Although external fixation has recently been used successfully [6], [7], [8], we hesitated to place pins close to the femoral component, because a pin infection is common with use of this treatment [1], [5]. A flexible intramedullary nail is the least stable and typically causes shortening and rotational malunion [5], [9]. Revision of the implant with a long stem femoral component was also considered, although x-rays showed osteoporosis and no evidence of loosening of either component. Recently, the LISS plate fixation has been reported, because it secures fixation and allows for minimal fracture site dissection which may reduce intraoperative blood loss and risk of infection [5], [10]. However, it had not been introduced in Japan at this time and so we were unable to use it.

We referred the option to lengthen the femoral stem for treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty [11], and found the 16 mm-diameter Küntcher nail, when cut at its proximal end, fits firmly to the stem of the same femoral component of our patient (Fig. 5). During the operation, the nonunion site was fixed firmly by the original method. We were concerned about metallosis caused by the interaction between the different metal components of the stem and the Küntcher nail, but the patient experienced no problems for one and one-half years after the re-operation, and finally bony union was obtained.


View full-size image.

Fig. 5. A 16 mm-diameter Küntcher nail and a stemmed femoral component (A) before and (B) after fitting.


This method may be an appropriate alternative to plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar nonunion around stemmed total knee femoral components.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Periprosthetic fractures adjacent to total knee implants. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1997;79:1100.

[2]. [2]Bezwada HP, Neubauer P, Baker J, et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:453.

[3]. [3]Rolston LD, Christ DJ, Halpern A, et al. Treatment of supracondylar fractures of the femur proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1995;77:924.

[4]. [4]McLaren AC, Dopont JA, Schroeber DC. Open reduction internal fixation of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasties using the intramedullary supracondylar rod. Clin Orthop. 1994;302:194.

[5]. [5]Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG, et al. Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2003;18:834.

[6]. [6]Hurson C, Synnott K, McCormack D. Above-knee Ilizarov external fixation for early periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture — a case report. Knee. 2005;12:145. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (185 KB) | CrossRef

[7]. [7]Merkel KD, Johnson EW. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1986;68:29.

[8]. [8]Robin G, Simon DO, Brinker M. Use of Ilizarov external fixation for a periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. J Arthroplast. 1999;14:118.

[9]. [9]Tharani R, Nakasone C, Vince KG. Periprosthetic fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:27.

[10]. [10]Raab GE, Davis CM. Early healing with total knee arthroplasties using locked condylar plating of periprosthetic fracture around the knee. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:984.

[11]. [11]Ries MD. Intraoperative modular stem lengthening to treat periprosthetic femur fracture. J Arthroplast. 1996;11:204.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3–2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama Prefecture 359–8513, Japan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 4 2995 1663; fax: +81 4 2996 5208.

PII: S0968-0160(06)00186-4

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2006.10.011


View previous. 15 of 22 View next.