The Knee
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 484-488 , December 2009

A mid-term clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot knee arthroplasty

Received 22 September 2008 ,Revised 8 March 2009 ,Accepted 9 March 2009.

References 

  1. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86-B:979
  2. Schmidt R, Komistek RD, Blaha JD, Penenberg BL, Maloney WJ. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop. 2003;410:139
  3. Blaha JD. The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4):22
  4. Andriacchi T. Functional analysis of pre and post knee surgery. Total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:575
  5. Insall JN, Clarke HD. Historic development, classification and characteristics of knee prostheses. In:  Insall JN,  Scott WN editor. Surgery of the knee. ed3. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2001;p. 1530
  6. O'Connor J, Shercliff T, Fitzpatrick D, Goodfellow JW. Geometry of the knee in the saggital. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 1989;203(4):223–233
  7. O'Connor J, Shercliff T, Fitzpatrick D, Goodfellow JW. Mechanics of the knee. In:  Daniel D,  Akeson W,  O'Connor J editor. Knee ligaments structure, function, injury and repair. New York: Raven Press, Ltd; 1990;p. 201
  8. Van Dijk R, Huiskes R, Selvik G. Roentgen stereogrammetric methods for the evaluation of the three dimensional kinematic behaviour and cruciate ligament length patterns of the human knee joint. J Biomech. 1979;12:727
  9. Kurosawa H, Walker P, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech. 1985;85:487
  10. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;82-B:1189
  11. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studies by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;82-A:1196
  12. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MA, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studies by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov. 2000;82(8):1199–1200
  13. Karrholm J, Brandson S, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial tibial rotation cause by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;82-B:1201
  14. Martelli S, Piskerova V. The shapes of the tibial and femoral articular surfaces in relation to tibiofemoral movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84-B:607
  15. Freeman MAR, Pinskerova V. The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop. 2003;410:35
  16. Blaha JD, Mancinelli CA, Simons WH, Kish VL, Thyagarajan G. Kinematics of the human knee using an open chain cadaver model. Clin Orthop. 2003;410:25
  17. Freeman MAR, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2005;38:197
  18. Pinskerova V, Maquet P, Freeman MA. Annotation: the anatomic literature relating to the knee between 1836–1917. Clin Orthop. 2003;410:13
  19. Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S, Sosna A, Williams A, Gedroyc W, et al. Does the femur roll back with flexion?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86-B:925
  20. Halley DK, Charnley J. Results of Low Friction Arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger. Clin Orthop. 1975;112:180
  21. Davies AP. Rating systems for total knee replacement. The Knee. 2002;9:261
  22. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:13
  23. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important, patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95
  24. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40
  25. Van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12. A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1141
  26. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80-B:63
  27. Ewald FC. The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:9
  28. Dobbs SH. Survivorship of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B:168
  29. Cornel NC, Ranawat SC. Survivorship analysis of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68-A:1430
  30. Lettin AWF, Ware HS, Morris RW. Survivorship analysis and confidence limits: an assessment with reference to the Stanmore total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73-B:729
  31. Ewald FC, Wright RJ, Poss R, Thomas WH, Mason MD, Sledge CB. Kinematic total knee arthroplasty: a 10 to 14 year prospective follow-up review. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:473
  32. Shakespeare D, Ledger M, Kinzel V. Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the medial pivot knee and a posterior stabilised implant. Knee. 2006;13(5):371
  33. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1719
  34. Amin A, Al-Taiar A, Sanghrajka AP, Kang N, Scott G. The early radiological follow up of a medial rotational design of total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2008;15(3):222
  35. Shakespeare D, Kinzel V, Ledger M. Achieving ligament stability and correct rotational alignment of the femur in knee arthroplasty. A study using the medial pivot knee. The Knee. 2005;12:419

PII: S0968-0160(09)00045-3

doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.03.002

The Knee
Volume 16, Issue 6 , Pages 484-488 , December 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution