The Knee
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 135-140, March 2010

A single measure of patellar kinematics is an inadequate surrogate marker for patterns of three-dimensional kinematics in healthy knees

  • E.J. McWalter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 500-828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L8
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 604 875 4111x66413; fax: +1 604 875 4851.
  • ,
  • N.J. MacIntyre

      Affiliations

    • School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Canada
  • ,
  • J. Cibere

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada
    • Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Canada
  • ,
  • D.R. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Canada
    • Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Canada

Received 1 June 2009; received in revised form 17 July 2009; accepted 2 August 2009. published online 01 September 2009.

Abstract 

Patellofemoral disorders, such as osteoarthritis and patellofemoral pain, are thought to be associated with abnormal patellar kinematics. However, assessments of three-dimensional patellar kinematics are time consuming and expensive. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single static measure of three-dimensional patellar kinematics provides a surrogate marker for three-dimensional patellar kinematics over a range of flexion angles. We assessed three-dimensional patellar kinematics (flexion, tilt and spin; lateral, anterior and proximal translation) at sequential static angles through approximately 45° of loaded knee flexion in 40 normal subjects using a validated, MRI-based method. The surrogate marker was defined as the static measure at 30° of knee flexion and the pattern of kinematics was defined as the slope of the linear best fit line of each subject's kinematic data. A regression model was used to examine the relationship between the surrogate marker and pattern of kinematics. The surrogate marker predicted 26% of the variance in pattern of patellar flexion (p<0.001), 27% of the variance in pattern of patellar spin (p=0.003), 11% of the variance in pattern of proximal translation (p=0.037) and 39% of the variance in pattern of anterior translation (p<0.001). No relationships were seen between the surrogate marker and tilt or lateral translation. The results suggest that a single measure of patellar parameters at 30° knee flexion is an inadequate surrogate marker of three-dimensional patellar kinematics; therefore, a complete assessment of patellar kinematics, over a range of knee flexion angles, is preferable to adequately assess patterns of patellar kinematics.

Keywords: Patellofemoral, Kinematics, Magnetic resonance imaging, Knee, Alignment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0968-0160(09)00133-1

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.08.001

The Knee
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 135-140, March 2010