« Previous
Next »
The Knee
Volume 17, Issue 3
, Pages 196-199
, June 2010
Are pain and function better measures of outcome than revision rates after TKR in the younger patient?
References
- . Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J. Bone Jt. Surg., [Br]. 1993;75-2:178–182
- . Pain in the assessment of total knee replacement. J. Bone Jt Surg., [Br]. 1998;80-3:426–431
- . Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 1996;78-5:802–808
- . Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 1997;79-1:93–98
- . Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J. Arthroplast. 1998;13-8:890–895
- . Sports activities 5
years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005;64-12:1715–1720 - . Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade. A successful operation, for which there's a large unmet need. BMJ. 2000;320-7238:820
- . Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. 2003;85-A-2:259–265
- . Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004;63-7:825–830
- . Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993;286:94–102
- . Cemented all polyethylene tibial components in patients age 75
years and older. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999;367:73–80 - . The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 1989;71-5:793–797
- . Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40
years of age and younger with osteoarthritis. Clin. Orthop.Relat. Res. 2000;380:85–90 - Total knee replacements in young, active patients: long term follow-up and functional outcome. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. 1997;79:575–582
- . Total knee arthroplasty in patients less than 50
years old. J Arthroplast. 2002;17:538–543 - . Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 2006;88:1158–1163
- . Concensus statement on total knee replacement Dec 8–10, 2003. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. 2004;86-A:1328–1335
- . The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30, 003 knees 1976–1992. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1994;65-4:375–386
- . Rates of revision knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. 1999;81-6:773–782
- . Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007;464:83–87
- . Early failures among 7, 174 primary total knee replacements: a follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2000. Acta Orthop. Scand. 2002;73-2:117–129
- . Patient demographics as a predictor of the ten-year survival rate in primary total knee replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 2003;85-1:52–56
- . Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54-1:226–229
- . Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br. J. Cancer. 1977;35-1:1–39
- . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg., [Br]. 1998;80-1:63–69
- . Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop. 1989;13-248:13–14
- . The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989;248:9–12
- . Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire. The effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. 2001;83-3:345–347
PII: S0968-0160(09)00170-7
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.09.003
« Previous
Next »
The Knee
Volume 17, Issue 3
, Pages 196-199
, June 2010
