The Knee
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 1-4, January 2011

A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty?

  • Richard W. Parkinson

      Affiliations

    • Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Road, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, CH49 5PE, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 6047023; fax: +44 151 6047078.
  • ,
  • Peter R. Kay

      Affiliations

    • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, WN6 9NP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Arvind Rawal

      Affiliations

    • Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Road, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, CH49 5PE, United Kingdom

Received 24 February 2010; received in revised form 28 April 2010; accepted 29 April 2010. published online 19 August 2010.

Abstract 

Infection in total knee replacement is a rare but devastating complication. The current literature tends to support a two-stage revision as definitive treatment of established deep infection. Despite the fact that single stage revision is a well recognised treatment for the infected hip replacement, it has not gained the same level of support in the knee.

This article reviews the literature of two-stage and single stage revision and reports the senior author's experience with the latter.

Keywords: One stage, Revision, Infection, Total knee arthroplasty

 

PII: S0968-0160(10)00081-5

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2010.04.008

The Knee
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 1-4, January 2011