The Knee
Volume 18, Issue 6 , Pages 407-411, December 2011

Shod landing provides enhanced energy dissipation at the knee joint relative to barefoot landing from different heights

  • C.H. Yeow

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Division of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • P.V.S. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Australia
    • Biomechanics Lab, Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, Singapore
  • ,
  • J.C.H. Goh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Division of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NUS Tissue Engineering Programme, Office of Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, 27 Medical Drive, Singapore 117510, Singapore. Tel.: +65 6516 5259; fax: +65 6776 5322.

Received 31 March 2010; received in revised form 22 July 2010; accepted 25 July 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Abstract 

Athletic shoes can directly provide shock absorption at the foot due to its cushioning properties, however it remains unclear how these shoes may affect the level of energy dissipation contributed by the knee joint. This study sought to investigate biomechanical differences, in terms of knee kinematics, kinetics and energetics, between barefoot and shod landing from different heights. Twelve healthy male recreational athletes were recruited and instructed to perform double-leg landing from 0.3-m and 0.6-m heights in barefoot and shod conditions. The shoe model tested was Brooks Maximus II. Markers were placed on the subjects based on the Plug-in Gait Marker Set. Force-plates and motion-capture system were used to capture ground reaction force (GRF) and kinematics data respectively. 2×2-ANOVA (barefoot/shod condition×landing height) was performed to examine differences in knee kinematics, kinetics and energetics between barefoot and shod conditions from different landing heights. Peak GRF was not significantly different (p=0.732–0.824) between barefoot and shod conditions for both landing heights. Knee range-of-motion, flexion angular velocity, external knee flexion moment, and joint power and work were higher during shod landing (p<0.001 to p=0.007), compared to barefoot landing for both landing heights. No significant interactions (p=0.073–0.933) were found between landing height and barefoot/shod condition for the tested parameters. While the increase in landing height can elevate knee energetics independent of barefoot/shod conditions, we have also shown that the shod condition was able to augment the level of energy dissipation contributed by the knee joint, via the knee extensors, regardless of the tested landing heights.

Keywords: Energy dissipation, Shod landing, Kinetics, kinematics and energetics, Joint power and eccentric work, Landing impact

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0968-0160(10)00141-9

doi:10.1016/j.knee.2010.07.011

The Knee
Volume 18, Issue 6 , Pages 407-411, December 2011