Prosthetic reconstruction of the arthritic knee: considerations for limb alignment, geometry and soft tissue reconstruction

  • T.Derek V. Cooke
    Corresponding author.
    Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Biological and Medical Research, MBC 77, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Brian Kelly
    Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Biological and Medical Research, MBC 77, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jian Li
    Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Biological and Medical Research, MBC 77, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, PO Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author


      The function of the replaced knee joint is influenced by many factors, including implant design, material properties, fixation and surgical techniques. General surgical approaches have changed in tandem with design developments, but within them various technical elements of knee surgery are strongly adhered to (conservation) whilst others are vigorously debated (variation). The merits of debate are beyond dispute, but it is problematic to surgical patients that variations in surgical technology can beget variations in the performance of knee implants. One can make a strong argument for standardisation of techniques to keep abreast of advances in the fundamental knowledge of the anatomy and kinematics of the human knee. This paper considers an approach to restore normal knee function and kinematics through resurfacing of bone parts, developed from an appreciation of the derangements induced by disease processes on limb alignment and soft tissue restraints. The location and orientation of the implanted parts, optimally sized, is based on the functional axes of the knee, an approach which uses the bony attachment points of the essential ligamentous structures as the principle guides.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Knee
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bargren JH
        • Blaha JD
        • Freeman MA
        Alignment in total knee arthroplasty — correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983; 173: 178-183
        • Insall J
        • Trias AJ
        • Scott WN
        The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first five years.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1979; 145: 68-77
      1. Hungerford DS, Krackow KS, Kenna RB. The Howmedica® Universal™ total knee instrument system. Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ, 1980.

        • Cloutier JM
        Results of total knee arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1983; 65A: 906-910
      2. Krackow KA. The technique of total knee arthroplasty. Missouri, USA: The CV Mosby Company, 1990.

        • Lotke PA
        • Ecker ML
        Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1977; 59A: 77-79
        • Cooke TDV
        • Saunders G
        • Siu D
        • Yoshioka Y
        • Wevers HW
        Universal bone cutting device for precision knee replacement arthroplasty and osteotomy.
        J Biomed Eng. 1985; 7: 45-50
      3. Cooke TDV, Harada Y, Saunders G, Siu D, Wevers H, Yoshioka Y. Application of bench mounted saws for the precision replacement arthroplasty of the arthritic knee — the QUESTOR system. In: Muller W, Hackenbruch T, editors. Surgery and arthroscopy of the knee. 2nd congress of the European Society. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1988:542–555.

        • Laskin RS
        • Rieger MA
        The surgical technique for performing a total knee replacement arthroplasty.
        Orthop Clin N Am. 1989; 20: 31-48
        • Armstrong D
        • Legault L
        • Cooke TDV
        • et al.
        A prospective analysis of total knee replacement alignment using standardized knee radiography comparing DePuy, Howmedica, and `QUESTOR' systems American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
        Orthop Trans. 1988; 12: 466-467
        • Moreland JR
        Mechanics of failure of total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1988; 226: 49-64
        • Yoshioka Y
        • Cooke TDV
        Femoral anteversion: assessment based on function axes.
        J Orthop Res. 1987; 5: 86-91
        • Yoshioka Y
        • Siu D
        • Cooke TDV
        The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1987; 69A: 873-880
        • Yoshioka Y
        • Siu DW
        • Scudamore RA
        • Cooke TDV
        Tibial anatomy and functional axes.
        J Orthop Res. 1989; 7: 132-137
        • Hollister AM
        • Jatana S
        • Singh AK
        • Sullivan WW
        • Lupichuk AG
        The axes of rotation of the knee.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993; 290: 259-268
        • Elias SG
        • Freeman MAR
        • Gokcay EI
        A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1990; 260: 98-102
      4. Cooke TDV. Principles of alignment in primary and revision knee replacement. In: Hirohata K, Kurosaka M, Cooke TDV, editors. Joint surgery up to date. Tokyo: Spriner-Verlag, 1989:59–64.

      5. Cooke TDV, Siu D, Fisher B. The use of standardized radiographs to identify the deformities associated with osteoarthritis. In: Noble J, Galasko CSB, editors. Recent developments in orthopaedic surgery. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989:264–271

        • Cooke TDV
        • Pichora D
        • Siu D
        • Scudamore RA
        • Bryant JT
        Surgical implications of varus deformity of the knee with obliquity of the joint surfaces.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1989; 71B: 560-565
        • Cooke TDV
        • Sorbie C
        • Scudamore RA
        • Bryant JT
        • Siu D
        • Fisher B
        A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1991; 73B: 715-720
        • Siu D
        • Cooke TDV
        • Broekhoven LD
        • et al.
        A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice, applications, and error analysis.
        Invest Radiol. 1991; 26: 71-77
        • Nguyen C
        • Bryant JT
        • Cooke TDV
        • Chow D
        Alignment and geometry of the normal knee in stance.
        Orthop Trans. 1989; 13: 145
      6. Kelly B, Cooke TDV, Saunders G, Wyss UP. Questor saw jig mark IV — Machining principles in total knee replacement. J Med Eng Phys, submitted.

        • Moreland JR
        • Bassett LW
        • Hanker GJ
        Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1987; 69A: 745-749
        • Tetsworth K
        • Paley D
        Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy.
        Orth Clin N Am. 1994; 25: 367-382
      7. Cooke TDV, Bryant JT, Scudamore RA: Biomechanical factors in alignment and arthritic disorders of the knee. In: Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KG, editors. The knee. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1994:1061–1078

        • Li J
        • Scudamore RA
        • Khan B
        • Cooke TDV
        • Wyss UP
        Elements of lower limb alignment in Caucasian and Arab patients having osteoarthritis with varus knees.
        Orthop Trans. 1994; 18: 676
        • Eckhoff DG
        Effect of limb malrotation on malalignment and osteoarthritis.
        Orthop Clin N Am. 1994; 25: 405-414
        • Frankel VH
        • Burstein AH
        • Brooks DB
        Biomechanics of internal derangement of the knee.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1971; 53A: 945-962
        • Woltring HJ
        • Huiskes R
        • De Lange A
        • Veldpaus FE
        Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics.
        J Biomech. 1985; 18: 379-389
        • Berger RA
        • Rubash HE
        • Seel MJ
        • Thompson WH
        • Crossett LS
        Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993; 286: 40-47
        • Shrive NG
        • O'Connor JJ
        • Goodfellow JW
        Load-bearing in the knee joint.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1978; 131: 279-281
        • Beaupre A
        • Choukroun R
        • Guidouin R
        • Garneau R
        • Gerardin H
        • Cardou A
        Knee menisci: correlations between microstructure and biomechanics.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1986; 208: 72-77
        • Noyes FR
        • Schipplein OD
        • Andriacchi TP
        • Saddemi SR
        • Weise M
        The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee with varus alignment: an analysis of gait adaptations and dynamic joint loadings.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 707-716
        • Andriacchi TP
        Dynamics of knee malalignment.
        Orthop Clin N Am. 1994; 25: 395-403
      8. Arima J, Whiteside L, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. 1995;77-A:1331–1334.

        • Yoshi I
        • Whiteside LA
        • Anouchi YS
        The effect of patellar button placement and femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1992; 275: 211-219
        • Figgie HE
        • Goldberg VM
        • Hieple KG
        • Moller HS
        • Gordon NH
        The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on the function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1986; 68A: 1035-1039
        • Rhoads DD
        • Noble PC
        • Reuben JD
        • Tullos HS
        The effect of femoral component position on kinematics of total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993; 286: 122-129
      9. Sambatakakis A. Biomechanics of imbalance in the reconstruction of the arthritic knee. Ph.D. Thesis. Scotland: University of Strathclyde, 1992.

        • Sambatakakis A
        • Attfield SF
        • Newton G
        Quantification of soft-tissue imbalance in condylar knee arthroplasty.
        J Biomed Eng. 1993; 15: 339-343
        • Sidles JA
        • Matsen FA
        • Garbini JL
        • Larson RV
        • Larsen JM
        Total knee arthroplasty: functional effects of tibial resection level.
        Orthop Trans. 1986; 11: 263
        • Andriacchi TP
        Functional analysis of pre and post-knee surgery: Total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction.
        J Biomech Eng. 1993; 115: 575-581
        • Laskin RS
        Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10: 657-660
        • Griffin M
        • Fisher SB
        • Siu D
        • Cooke TDV
        Mismatched femoral components in total knee replacement.
        Orthop Trans. 1994; 18: 138
        • Mantas JP
        • Bloebaum RD
        • Skedros JG
        • Hofmann AA
        Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7: 525-531