Six weeks of continuous joint distraction appears sufficient for clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis



      Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a surgical joint-preserving treatment in which the knee joint is temporarily distracted by an external frame. It is associated with joint tissue repair and clinical improvement. Initially, patients were submitted to an eight-week distraction period, and currently patients are submitted to a six-week distraction period. This study evaluates whether a shorter distraction period influences the outcome.


      Both groups consisted of 20 patients. Clinical outcome was assessed by WOMAC questionnaires and VAS-pain. Cartilaginous tissue repair was assessed by radiographic joint space width (JSW) and MRI-observed cartilage thickness.


      Baseline data between both groups were comparable. Both groups showed an increase in total WOMAC score; 24 ± 4 in the six-week group and 32 ± 5 in the eight-week group (both p < 0.001). Mean JSW increased 0.9 ± 0.3 mm in the six-week group and 1.1 ± 0.3 mm in the eight-week group (p = 0.729 between groups). The increase in mean cartilage thickness on MRI was 0.6 ± 0.2 mm in the eight-week group and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm in the six-week group (p = 0.277).


      A shorter distraction period does not influence short-term clinical and structural outcomes statistically significantly, although effect sizes tend to be smaller in six week KJD as compared to eight week KJD.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Knee
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Carr A.J.
        • Robertsson O.
        • Graves S.
        • Price A.J.
        • Arden N.K.
        • Judge A.
        • et al.
        Knee replacement.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 1331-1340
        • W-Dahl A.
        • Robertsson O.
        • Lidgren L.
        Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a Swedish register study.
        Acta Orthop. 2010; 81: 161-164
        • Meehan J.P.
        • Danielsen B.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Jamali A.A.
        • White R.H.
        Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprothetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 529-535
        • Mastbergen S.C.
        • Saris D.B.
        • Lafeber F.P.J.G.
        Functional articular cartilage repair: here, near, or is the best approach not yet clear?.
        Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013; 9: 277-290
        • Van Valburg A.A.
        • van Roy H.
        • Lafeber F.P.
        • Bijlsma J.W.
        Beneficial effects of intermittent fluid pressure of low physiological magnitude on cartilage and inflammation in osteoarthritis. An in vitro study.
        J Rheumatol. 1998; 25: 515-520
        • Intema F.
        • Van Roermund P.M.
        • Marijnissen A.C.
        • Cotafana S.
        • Eckstein F.
        • Castelein R.M.
        • et al.
        Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: an open 1-year pilot study.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70: 1441-1446
        • Wiegant K.
        • Van Roermund P.M.
        • Intema F.
        • Cotafana S.
        • Eckstein F.
        • Mastbergen S.C.
        • et al.
        Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis.
        Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013; 21: 1660-1667
        • Kuchuk N.O.
        • Wiegant K.
        • van der Woude J.A.D.
        • van Roermund P.M.
        • Intema F.
        • Eckstein F.
        • et al.
        Clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair after knee joint distraction: 5 years follow-up.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74: 359
        • Abouheif M.M.
        • Nakamura M.
        • Deie M.
        • Adachi N.
        • Nishimori M.
        • Sera S.
        • et al.
        Repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee joint using autologous and artificial bone graft combined with motion preserving distraction arthroplasty: a case report.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130: 231-236
        • Aly T.A.
        • Hafez K.
        • Amin O.
        Arthrodiatasis for management of knee osteoarthritis.
        Orthopedics. 2011; 34: 338-343
        • Deie M.
        • Ochi M.
        • Adachi N.
        • Kajiwara R.
        • Kanaya A.
        A new articulated distraction arthroplasty device for treatment of osteoarthritic knee joint: a preliminary report.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 833-838
        • Wiegant K.
        • van Heerwaarden R.J.
        • van der Woude J.A.D.
        • Custers R.J.H.
        • Emans P.
        • Kuchuck N.O.
        • et al.
        Knee joint distraction as an alternative surgical procedure for patients with osteoarthritis considered for high tibial osteotomy or for a total knee prosthesis: rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials.
        Int J Orthop. 2015; 2: 353-360
        • Holmes S.B.
        • Brown S.J.
        • Pin Site Care Expert Panel
        Skeletal pin site care: National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses guidelines for orthopaedic nursing.
        Orthop Nurs. 2005; 24: 99-106
        • Marijnissen A.C.
        • Vincken K.L.
        • Vos P.A.
        • Saris D.B.
        • Viergever M.A.
        • Bijlsma J.W.
        • et al.
        Knee images digital analysis (KIDA): a novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail.
        Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008; 16: 234-243
        • Burgkart R.
        • Glaser C.
        • Hyhlik-Durr A.
        • Englmeier K.H.
        • Reiser M.
        • Eckstein F.
        Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44: 2072-2077
        • Graichen H.
        • von Eisenhart-Rothe R.
        • Vogl T.
        • Englmeier K.H.
        • Eckstein F.
        Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50: 811-816
        • Eckstein F.
        • Buck R.J.
        • Burstein D.
        • Charles H.C.
        • Crim J.
        • Hudelmaier M.
        • et al.
        Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67: 1683-1688
        • Pham T.
        • van der Heijde D.
        • Altman R.D.
        • Anderson J.J.
        • Bellamy N.
        • Hochberg M.
        • et al.
        OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited.
        Osteoarthr Cartil. 2004; 12: 389-399
        • Emrani P.S.
        • Katz J.N.
        • Kessler C.L.
        • Reichmann W.M.
        • Wright E.A.
        • McAlindon T.E.
        • et al.
        Joint space narrowing and Kellgren–Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis.
        Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008; 16: 873-882
        • Wiegant K.
        • Intema F.
        • van Roermund P.M.
        • Barten-van Rijbroek A.D.
        • Doornebal A.
        • Hazewinkel H.A.
        • et al.
        Evidence of cartilage repair by joint distraction in a canine model of osteoarthritis.
        Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67: 465-474
        • Wiegant K.
        • van Roermund P.M.
        • van Heerwaarden R.
        • Spruijt S.
        • Custers R.
        • Kuchuk N.
        • et al.
        Total knee prosthesis after joint distraction treatment.
        J Surg Surg Res. 2015; 1: 66-71
        • Lui T.H.
        • Chan L.K.
        Deep peroneal nerve injury following external fixation of the ankle: case report and anatomic study.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32: S550-S555
        • Watt T.
        • Hariharan A.R.
        • Brzezinski D.W.
        • Caird M.S.
        • Zeller J.L.
        Branching patterns and localization of the common fibular (peroneal) nerve: an anatomical basis for planning safe surgical approaches.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36: 821-828
        • Auroy Y.
        • Benhamou D.
        • Bargues L.
        • Ecoffey C.
        • Falissard B.
        • Mercier F.
        • et al.
        Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: the SOS regional anesthesia hotline service.
        Anesthesiology. 2002; 97: 1274-1280
        • Shelburne K.B.
        • Kim H.J.
        • Sterret W.I.
        • Pandy M.G.
        Effect of posterior tibial slope on knee biomechanics during functional activity.
        J Orthop Res. 2011; 29: 223-231
        • Shao Q.
        • MacLeod T.D.
        • Manal K.
        • Buchanan T.S.
        Estimation of ligament loading and anterior tibial translation in healthy and ACL-deficient knees during gait and the influence of increasing tibial slope using EMG-driven approach.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 39: 110-121
        • Agneskirchner J.D.
        • Hurschler C.
        • Stukenborg-Colsman C.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Lobenhoffer P.
        Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124: 575-584