Advertisement

Understanding rates, risk factors, and complications associated with manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): An analysis of 100,613 TKAs

Published:September 01, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.08.009

      Highlights

      • 1 in 36 patients undergo manipulation after primary total knee arthroplasty.
      • Manipulation is most commonly performed within 3 months (70%).
      • Risk factors for manipulation are younger age, female sex, Black or Hispanic race.
      • Robotic and computer-assisted TKA are associated with less risk of manipulation.
      • Though infrequent, manipulation may be associated with mechanical complications.

      Abstract

      Background

      Considering the growing adoption of technology-assisted total knee arthroplasties (TKA), previous database studies evaluating post-operative stiffness may be outdated. The present study aimed to: (1) evaluate the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after primary TKA; (2) determine independent risk factors for MUA; and (3) assess complications after MUA.

      Methods

      Primary TKAs, with at least 6-month follow-up, were identified from the Florida State Inpatient Database (January 2016–June 2018) and linked to outpatient records from the Florida State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to compare patient factors and complications (e.g., mechanical, non-mechanical, infectious) associated with MUA, while adjusting for baseline demographics, comorbidities, use of robotic- and computer-technologies, time to MUA (0–3, 3–12, or >12 months), and need for repeat MUA (one-time vs >1).

      Results

      The MUA rate was 2.8% (2821 of 100,613). Being younger, a woman, Black or Hispanic; having private or self-pay insurance; and conventional TKA were associated with significantly higher odds of undergoing MUA. Higher rates of mechanical complications and acute posthemorrhagic anemia were observed in the MUA cohort. Time to MUA, repeat MUA, and baseline demographics were not associated with complication rates among the MUA cohort.

      Conclusion

      Overall, 1 in 36 patients underwent MUA after primary TKA. Several non-modifiable patient characteristics, such as Black or Hispanic race, female sex, and younger age were associated with an increased risk of MUA. However, technology-assisted TKA might help to decrease the risk of MUA.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Knee
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shan L.
        • Shan B.
        • Suzuki A.
        • Nouh F.
        • Saxena A.
        Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement.
        J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2015; 97: 156-168https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00372
        • Kim JANE
        • Nelson C.L.
        • Lotke P.A.
        Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 1479-1484
        • Pariente G.M.
        • Lombardi A.V.
        • Berend K.R.
        • Mallory T.H.
        • Adams J.B.
        Manipulation with prolonged epidural analgesia for treatment of TKA complicated by arthrofibrosis.
        Surg Technol Int. 2006; 15: 221-224
        • Zachwieja E.
        • Perez J.
        • Hardaker W.M.
        • Levine B.
        • Sheth N.
        Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
        JBJS Rev. 2018; 6: e2-ehttps://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00113
        • Manrique J.
        • Gomez M.M.
        • Parvizi J.
        Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.
        J Knee Surg. 2015; 28: 119-126https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396079
        • Cheuy V.A.
        • Foran J.R.H.
        • Paxton R.J.
        • Bade M.J.
        • Zeni J.A.
        • Stevens-Lapsley J.E.
        Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 2604-2611https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005
        • Thompson R.
        • Novikov D.
        • Cizmic Z.
        • Feng J.E.
        • Fideler K.
        • Sayeed Z.
        • et al.
        Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2019; 50: 269-279
        • Le D.H.
        • Goodman S.B.
        • Maloney W.J.
        • Huddleston J.I.
        Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2197-2200https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3540-y
        • Emara A.K.
        • Zhou G.
        • Klika A.K.
        • Koroukian S.M.
        • Schiltz N.K.
        • Krebs V.E.
        • et al.
        Robotic-arm–assisted knee arthroplasty associated with favorable in-hospital metrics and exponentially rising adoption compared with manual knee arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29: e1328-e1342https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00146
        • Siddiqi A.
        • Mont M.A.
        • Krebs V.E.
        • Piuzzi N.S.
        Not all robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty are the same.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29: 45-59https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00654
        • Doan G.W.
        • Courtis R.P.
        • Wyss J.G.
        • Green E.W.
        • Clary C.W.
        Image-free robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves implant alignment accuracy: a cadaveric study.
        J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37: 795-801
        • Batailler C.
        • Fernandez A.
        • Swan J.
        • Servien E.
        • Haddad F.S.
        • Catani F.
        • et al.
        MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 3585-3598
        • Khlopas A.
        • Sodhi N.
        • Sultan A.A.
        • Chughtai M.
        • Molloy R.M.
        • Mont M.A.
        Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 2002-2006https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.060
        • Kayani B.
        • Konan S.
        • Ayuob A.
        • Onochie E.
        • Al-Jabri T.
        • Haddad F.S.
        Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
        EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4: 611-617https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022
        • Newman E.T.
        • Herschmiller T.A.
        • Attarian D.E.
        • Vail T.P.
        • Bolognesi M.P.
        • Wellman S.S.
        Risk factors, outcomes, and timing of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 245-249https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.002
        • Yoo J.-H.
        • Oh J.-C.
        • Oh H.-C.
        • Park S.-H.
        Manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.
        Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015; 27: 233-239https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.4.233
        • Malkani A.L.
        • Roche M.W.
        • Kolisek F.R.
        • Gustke K.A.
        • Hozack W.J.
        • Sodhi N.
        • et al.
        Manipulation under anesthesia rates in technology-assisted versus conventional-instrumentation total knee arthroplasty.
        Surg Technol Int. 2020; 36: 336-340
        • Feng J.
        • Novikov D.
        • Anoushiravani A.
        • Schwarzkopf R.
        Total knee arthroplasty: improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach.
        J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018; 11: 63-73https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S140550
        • Pfefferle K.J.
        • Shemory S.T.
        • Dilisio M.F.
        • Fening S.D.
        • Gradisar I.M.
        Risk factors for manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: a pooled electronic health record database study.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 2036-2038https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.001
        • Werner B.C.
        • Carr J.B.
        • Wiggins J.C.
        • Gwathmey F.W.
        • Browne J.A.
        Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty is associated with an increased incidence of subsequent revision surgery.
        J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 72-75https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.061
        • Pivec R.
        • Issa K.
        • Kester M.
        • Harwin S.
        • Mont M.
        Long-term outcomes of MUA for stiffness in primary TKA.
        J Knee Surg. 2013; 26: 405-410https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1341579
      1. Overview of the State Inpatient Databases (SID) [Internet]. HCUP; 2021. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/sidoverview.jsp.

      2. Overview of the state ambulatory surgery and services databases (SASD) [Internet]. HCUP; 2021. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/sasdoverview.jsp.

      3. Elixhauser Comorbidity Software Refined for ICD-10-CM [Internet]. HCUP; 2021. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidityicd10/comorbidity_icd10.jsp#overview.

        • Menendez M.E.
        • Neuhaus V.
        • van Dijk N.C.
        • Ring D.
        The elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2878-2886https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7
        • Brigati D.P.
        • Huddleston J.
        • Lewallen D.
        • Illgen R.
        • Jaffri H.
        • Ziegenhorn D.
        • et al.
        Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee: who still requires a revision arthroplasty?.
        J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: S348-S351https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.009
        • Kornuijt A.
        • Das D.
        • Sijbesma T.
        • de Vries L.
        • van der Weegen W.
        Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.
        Musculoskelet Surg. 2018; 102: 223-230https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0537-9
        • Knapp P.
        • Weishuhn L.
        • Pizzimenti N.
        • Markel D.C.
        Risk factors for manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B: 66-72
        • Issa K.
        • Rifai A.
        • Boylan M.R.
        • Pourtaheri S.
        • McInerney V.K.
        • Mont M.A.
        Do various factors affect the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 143-147https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3772-x
        • Ofa S.A.
        • Ross B.J.
        • Flick T.R.
        • Patel A.H.
        • Sherman W.F.
        Robotic total knee arthroplasty vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide database study.
        Arthroplast Today. 2020; 6: 1001-1008.e3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.014
        • Chalmers B.P.
        • Goytizolo E.
        • Mishu M.D.
        • Westrich G.H.
        Manipulation under anaesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-B: 126-130
        • Crawford D.A.
        • Adams J.B.
        • Morris M.J.
        • Berend K.R.
        • Lombardi A.V.
        Manipulation under anesthesia after knee arthroplasty is associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship.
        J Knee Surg. 2021; 34: 739-744