Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 40, P166-173, January 2023

Download started.

Ok

Analysis of revision rates and complication rates among patients undergoing unicompartmental and bicompartmental knee Arthroplasties when compared to Total knee arthroplasty

Published:November 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.016

      Abstract

      Background

      With recent advances in partial knee arthroplasty, there is conflicting data regarding the outcomes and revision rates for bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) and unicompartamental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study uses national data to compare surgical and medical complications of UKA, BKA, and TKA to aid surgical decision-making.

      Methods

      A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Mariner dataset of the PearlDiver patient records database from 2010-2019. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients who underwent UKA, BKA, and TKA for a primary indication of osteoarthritis (OA). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine 1-year and 2-year revision, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and loosening, 1-year manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and 90-day postoperative medical complications.

      Results

      The BKA cohort was found to have higher odds of one and two-year revision compared to UKA and TKA cohorts. Additionally, the UKA cohort had higher odds of one and two-year revision but lower odds of 1-year MUA than the TKA cohort. However, both the BKA and UKA cohorts had lower odds of any 90-day postoperative complications when compared to the TKA cohort.

      Conclusions

      Even with modern implants and approaches, our study found that revision rates are highest for BKA followed by UKA and TKA at two years postoperatively. Notably, medical complications were much less common after all partial knee replacement types when compared to TKA. These findings may be used to guide patients in selecting the appropriate surgery to meet their goals and expectations.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Knee
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Cobb J. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Precise diagnosis and treatment. BMJ. 2009;339:b3747. Farr Ii J, Miller LE, Block JE. Quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a commentary on nonsurgical and surgical treatments. Open Orthop J 2013;7:619–23. doi:10.2174/1874325001307010619.

        • Stoddart J.C.
        • Dandridge O.
        • Garner A.
        • Cobb J.
        • van Arkel R.J.
        The compartmental distribution of knee osteoarthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021; 29: 445-455https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2020.10.011
        • Garner A.
        • van Arkel R.J.
        • Cobb J.
        Classification of combined partial knee arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 922-928
      2. National Joint Registry for England & Wales. Second Annual Report, September 2006. Available online: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/O/Documents/ England/Reports/NJR_CR_3.pdf.

        • Liddle A.D.
        • Judge A.
        • Pandit H.
        • et al.
        Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 1437-1445
      3. American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR): 2020 Annual Report. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), 2020.

        • Isaac S.M.
        • Barker K.L.
        • Danial I.N.
        • Beard D.J.
        • Dodd C.A.
        • Murray D.W.
        Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty.
        Knee. 2007; 14: 212-217https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2007.01.001
        • Rolston L.
        • Bresch J.
        • Engh G.
        • Franz A.
        • Kreuzer S.
        • Nadaud M.
        • et al.
        Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients.
        Orthopedics. 2007; 30: 70-73
      4. Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S. Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports.

        • Witjes S.
        • Gouttebarge V.
        • Kuijer P.P.
        • et al.
        Return to sports and physical activity after total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Sports Med. 2016; 46: 269-292
        • Beard D.J.
        • Davies L.J.
        • Cook J.A.
        • et al.
        The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2019; 394: 746-756https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31281-4
      5. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014;384:1437-45.

        • Hansen E.N.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Lau E.
        • et al.
        Unicondylar knee arthroplasty has fewer complications but higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty in a study of large united states databases.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1617-1625
        • Parratte S.
        • Ollivier M.
        • Lunebourg A.
        • Abdel M.P.
        • Argenson J.N.
        Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: long term results of partial knee arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B (PMID: 26430081): 9-15https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36426
        • Biazzo A.
        • Manzotti A.
        • Confalonieri N.
        Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: long term results.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2018; 84 (PMID: 30840563): 237-244
        • Mercurio M.
        • Gasparini G.
        • Familiari F.
        • Castioni D.
        • Galasso O.
        Outcomes of Bi-unicompartmental Versus total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial and lateral knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
        Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56 (PMID: 35669030; PMCID: PMC9123098): 963-972https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00628-1
        • Kooner S.
        • Johal H.
        • Clark M.
        Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
        Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3: 309-314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.006. PMID: 29204503; PMCID: PMC5712040
        • Gu A.
        • Agarwal A.R.
        • Fassihi S.C.
        • et al.
        Impact of sickle cell disease on postoperative outcomes following total hip arthroplasty.
        Hip Int. 2021; (11207000211052224 published online ahead of print, 2021 Oct 24)https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000211052224
      6. Elzomor A, Malyavko A, Agarwal AR, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus status does not independently predict 2-Year complications following total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 9]. J Knee Surg. 2022;10.1055/s-0042-1755376. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1755376.

      7. Oa prevalence and burden. Osteoarthritis Action Alliance. (2022, October 12). Retrieved October 18, 2022, from https://oaaction.unc.edu/oa-module/oa-prevalence-and-burden/.

        • Tong L.
        • Yu H.
        • Huang X.
        • et al.
        Current understanding of osteoarthritis pathogenesis and relevant new approaches.
        Bone Res. 2022; 10 (Published 2022 Sep 20): 60https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-022-00226-9
        • Yao D.
        • Akram I.
        • Daniilidis K.
        • Labey L.
        • Innocenti B.
        • Tibesku C.
        Bicompartmental, medial and patellofemoral knee replacement might be able to maintain unloaded knee kinematics.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 142: 501-509https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03816-0
        • Engh G.A.
        • Parks N.L.
        • Whitney C.E.
        A prospective randomized study of bicompartmental vs. total knee arthroplasty with functional testing and short term outcome.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 1790-1794https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.016
        • de Jesus C.
        • Stacey D.
        • Dervin G.F.
        Evaluation of a patient decision aid for unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty for medial knee osteoarthritis.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 3340-3344https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.014
        • Hutyra C.A.
        • Gonzalez J.M.
        • Yang J.-C.
        • Johnson F.R.
        • Reed S.D.
        • Amendola A.
        • et al.
        Patient preferences for surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a discrete-choice experiment evaluating total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102: 2022-2031https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00132
        • Siman H.
        • Kamath A.F.
        • Carrillo N.
        • Harmsen W.S.
        • Pagnano M.W.
        • Sierra R.J.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 1792-1797https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.020
        • Hansen E.N.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Lau E.
        • Kurtz S.M.
        • Lonner J.H.
        Unicondylar knee arthroplasty has fewer complications but higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty in a study of large United States databases.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1617-1625https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.004
        • Burnett Iii R.A.
        • Yang J.
        • Courtney P.M.
        • Terhune E.B.
        • Hannon C.P.
        • Della Valle C.J.
        Costs of unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study over ten years.
        Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-B: 23-31https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2259.R1
        • Kulshrestha V.
        • Datta B.
        • Kumar S.
        • Mittal G.
        Outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for early medial compartment arthritis: a randomized study.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 1460-1469https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.014
        • Courtney P.M.
        • Froimson M.I.
        • Meneghini R.M.
        • Lee G.C.
        • Della Valle C.J.
        Should medicare remove total knee arthroplasty from its inpatient only list? A total knee arthroplasty is not a partial knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: S23-S27https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.028
        • Jensen C.B.
        • Petersen P.B.
        • Jørgensen C.C.
        • et al.
        Length of stay and 90-day readmission/complication rates in unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a propensity-score-matched study of 10,494 procedures performed in a fast-track setup.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103: 1063-1071https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01287
        • Di Martino A.
        • Bordini B.
        • Barile F.
        • Ancarani C.
        • Digennaro V.
        • Faldini C.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has higher revisions than total knee arthroplasty at long term follow-up: a registry study on 6453 prostheses.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 3323-3329https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06184-1
        • Sierra R.J.
        • Kassel C.A.
        • Wetters N.G.
        • Berend K.R.
        • Della Valle C.J.
        • Lombardi A.V.
        Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk!.
        J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28: 128-132https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.040
        • Yamagami R.
        • Inui H.
        • Jo T.
        • et al.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower proportions of surgical site infection compared with total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective nationwide database study.
        Knee. 2021; 28: 124-130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.017
        • Lee C.S.
        • Su E.P.
        • Cross M.B.
        • Carli A.V.
        • Landy D.C.
        • Chalmers B.P.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of periprosthetic joint infection compared to total knee arthroplasty.
        Arthroplast Today. 2021; 10: 117-122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.006
        • Vasso M.
        • Corona K.
        • D’Apolito R.
        • Mazzitelli G.
        • Panni A.S.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: modes of failure and conversion to total knee arthroplasty.
        Joints. 2017; 5: 44-50https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601414
        • Niinimäki T.
        • Eskelinen A.
        • Mäkelä K.
        • Ohtonen P.
        • Puhto A.P.
        • Remes V.
        Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1496-1501https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3347-2
        • Ma J.-X.
        • He W.-W.
        • Kuang M.-J.
        • Sun L.
        • Lu B.
        • Wang Y.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for bicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: a meta analysis.
        Int J Surg. 2017; 46: 53-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.556
        • Elbardesy H.
        • Awad A.K.
        • McLeod A.
        • et al.
        Does bicompartmental knee arthroplasty hold an advantage over total knee arthroplasty? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        SICOT J. 2021; 7: 38https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021036
        • Biazzo A.
        • Silvestrini F.
        • Manzotti A.
        • Confalonieri N.
        Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study.
        Musculoskelet Surg. 2019; 103: 63-68https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0540-1
        • Tan S.M.
        • Dutton A.Q.
        • Bea K.C.
        • Kumar V.P.
        Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
        J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013; 21: 281-284https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901302100303
        • Tria A.J.J.
        Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the clinical outcomes.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2013; 44: viihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.003
        • Amit P.
        • Singh N.
        • Soni A.
        • Bowman N.K.
        • Maden M.
        Systematic review of modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medio-patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
        J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: 893-899.e3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.042