Abstract
Purpose
Few studies exist regarding sagittal alignment describing femur morphology in navigation-aided
surgery. This study investigated the three-dimensional (3D) sagittal femoral alignment
of the whole femur.
Methods
Seventy-three consecutive patients (59 females, 14 males, mean age: 76.1 years), yielding
140 femurs, were included in this study. A computed-tomography-based patient-specific
3D femur model was used to define a mechanical axis-based reference plane. Proximal
and distal femoral axis angles (PFA, DFA) to the reference plane were measured in
3D using custom software. PFA and DFA represent the proximal and distal inclination
of the femoral anatomical axis in sagittal plane, respectively.
Results
PFA (10.6 ± 1.5°) was greater than DFA (2.6 ± 1.6°; P < 0.0001). DFA in females (2.3 ± 1.4°) was smaller than in males (3.9 ± 1.7°; P < 0.0001).
Conclusion
This is the first report of measurement of femoral sagittal alignment related to both
3D anatomy and decision making of femoral flexion angle using navigation surgery for
total knee arthroplasty. This report shows a robust DFA measurement that could be
used as a template for femoral implants flexion angle when performing both conventional
and navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The KneeAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? An overview of the literature.Acta Orthop. 2014; 85: 480-487https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.940573
- Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 560-569https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018
- The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement.J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011; 93: 1588-1596https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00772
- Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011.J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28: 116-119
- Sagittal plane positioning of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3: 355-358
- Does flexion of the femoral implant in total knee arthroplasty increase knee flexion: A randomised controlled trial.Knee. 2014; 21: 257-263https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.028
- Influence of sagittal plane component alignment on kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25: 1686-1691https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4098-x
- Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1835-1839https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1580-z
- Sagittal alignment of the femoral component and patient height are associated with persisting flexion contracture after primary total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1476-1482https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.051
- The John Insall award: Control-matched evaluation of painful patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 10-17https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1485-3
- The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis.Int Orthop. 2014; 38: 379-385https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9
- Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 2403-2413https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0762-5
- Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8: 419-426
- Small differences between anatomical and mechanical sagittal femur axes: A radiological and navigated study of 50 patients.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132: 1053-1057https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1500-0
- Influence of the sagittal reference axis on the femoral component size.J Arthroplasty. 2012; 28: 943-949https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.004
- Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 2476-2482
- The assessment of femoral shaft morphology in the sagittal plane in Chinese patients with osteoarthritis-a radiographic analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2017; 12https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0626-8
- Variation in optimal sagittal alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedics. 2017; 40: 102-106
- The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 25-28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.011
- Sex differences in patients with CAM deformities with femoroacetabular impingement: 3-Dimensional computed tomographic quantification.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2301-2306
- Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement hip.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 358-362https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2693-9
- Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips.PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0231001https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231001
- Computed tomography-based three-dimensional analyses show similarities in anterosuperior acetabular coverage between acetabular dysplasia and borderline dysplasia.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 2623-2632https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.049
- The comparison of femoral curves and curves of contemporary intramedullary nails.Surg Radiol Anat. 2005; 27: 502-506https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0019-2
- Sex differences in femoral deformity determined using three-dimensional assessment for osteoarthritic knees.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25: 468-476
- Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty.J Orthop Res. 2005; 23: 41-45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.06.013
- Computed tomographic measurement of gender differences in bowing of the sagittal femoral shaft in persons older than 50 years.J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27: 1216-1220https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.024
- Variances in sagittal femoral shaft bowing in patients undergoing TKA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464: 99-104https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e4a2
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 30, 2023
Accepted:
December 7,
2022
Received in revised form:
November 13,
2022
Received:
May 14,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.