Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 41, P106-114, March 2023

A balance between native footprint coverage and overlap of the anterolateral meniscal root in tibial tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 3D MRI study

Published:January 13, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.004

      Abstract

      Background

      Tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is situated close to the anterior lateral meniscal root (ALMR) attachment.

      Purpose

      To investigate the impact of the size and location of the tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction on the ACL footprint coverage and overlap to the ALMR.

      Study design

      Controlled laboratory study.

      Methods

      Twenty knee MRI scans from twenty healthy subjects were recruited, and three-dimensional (3D) tibia models were created to show the tibial attachment sites of ACL and ALMR. Surgical simulation of the tibial tunnel drilling was performed on each 3D model, entering the joint at an angle set at 60 degrees from the tibial plateau plane and 55 degrees from the posterior tibial condylar axis, with analysis for six different drill sizes; 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 and 10 mm; and nine locations; the center of the ACL attachment and eight locations 2% of the tibial width apart surrounding it. The width of the tibial plateau, the distance between ACL and ALMR attachment centers, and the size and location of the potential tibial tunnel were evaluated to determine association with the area of the ACL footprint coverage and ALMR overlap using a linear mixed effects model.

      Results

      A large tunnel (p <.001), a central and anterior location (p <.029), and small tibial width (p =.015) were all associated with larger coverage of the ACL footprint. A large tunnel (p <.001), posteriorly and laterally located (p ≤ 0.001), and a small distance between the ACL and ALMR centers (p =.001) were significantly associated with a larger ALMR overlap. The association of the tunnel size to ALMR overlap reduced with a medial tunnel location.

      Conclusions

      The short distance between the centers of the ALMR attachment and native ACL footprint suggests that the ALMR will always be susceptible to overlap when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction. Small alterations in tunnel location can lead to a statistically significant alteration with the amount of ALMR overlap. To minimize this overlap, whilst maintaining acceptable coverage of the ACL footprint, a tibial tunnel positioned in a medial or anteromedial location from the center of the ACL footprint is recommended.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Knee
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chiba D.
        • Maeda S.
        • Sasaki E.
        • et al.
        Meniscal extrusion seen on ultrasonography affects the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a 3-year prospective cohort study.
        Clin Rheumatol. 2017; 36: 2557-2564https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3803-6
        • Costa C.R.
        • Morrison W.B.
        • Carrino J.A.
        Medial Meniscus Extrusion on Knee MRI: Is Extent Associated with Severity of Degeneration or Type of Tear?.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 17-23https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.1.1830017
        • Gao J.
        • Öqvist G.
        • Messner K.
        The attachments of the rabbit medial meniscus: A morphological investigation using image analysis and immunohistochemistry.
        J Anat. 1994; 185: 663-667
        • Grasso S.
        • Linklater J.
        • Li Q.
        • Parker D.A.
        Validation of an MRI Protocol for Routine Quantitative Assessment of Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 1624-1631https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518758950
        • Herbort M.
        • Lenschow S.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Petersen W.
        • Zantop T.
        ACL mismatch reconstructions: Influence of different tunnel placement strategies in single-bundle ACL reconstructions on the knee kinematics.
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 1551-1558https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1163-8
        • Kassam A.A.M.
        • Schranz P.J.
        • Mandalia V.I.
        Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Use of the Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus as a Guide to Tibial Tunnel Placement.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5: e809-e814https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.03.008
        • Kodama Y.
        • Furumatsu T.
        • Miyazawa S.
        • et al.
        Location of the tibial tunnel aperture affects extrusion of the lateral meniscus following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Orthop Res. 2017; 35: 1625-1633https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23450
        • Kusano M.
        • Yonetani Y.
        • Mae T.
        • Nakata K.
        • Yoshikawa H.
        • Shino K.
        Tibial insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: A histological and computed tomographic study.
        Knee. 2017; 24: 782-791https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.014
        • Laprade C.M.
        • Ellman M.B.
        • Rasmussen M.T.
        • et al.
        Anatomy of the anterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci: A quantitative analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2386-2392https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514544678
        • Laprade C.M.
        • Smith S.D.
        • Rasmussen M.T.
        • et al.
        Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, part 2: The posterior cruciate ligament.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 207-212https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514554771
        • Lord B.R.
        • El-Daou H.
        • Zdanowicz U.
        • Śmigielski R.
        • Amis A.A.
        The Role of Fibers Within the Tibial Attachment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Restraining Tibial Displacement.
        Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2019; 35: 2101-2111https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.058
        • Morey V.M.
        • Nag H.L.
        • Chowdhury B.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016; 7: 17-22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2015.06.003
        • Oka S.
        • Schuhmacher P.
        • Brehmer A.
        • Traut U.
        • Kirsch J.
        • Siebold R.
        Histological analysis of the tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion.
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 747-753https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3924-x
        • Oshima T.
        • Grasso S.
        • Beach A.
        • Fritsch B.
        • Parker D.A.
        Lateral location of the tibial tunnel increases lateral meniscal extrusion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med. 2019; (jisakos-2019-000303)https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000303
        • Oshima T.
        • Leie M.
        • Grasso S.
        • Parker D.A.
        Relationship between anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral meniscal root bony attachment: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis.
        Knee. 2019; 26: 537-544https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.013
        • Oshima T.
        • Putnis S.
        • Grasso S.
        • Klasan A.
        • Parker D.A.
        Graft Size and Orientation Within the Femoral Notch Affect Graft Healing at 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2019; (036354651988510)https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519885104
        • Parkinson B.
        • Gogna R.
        • Robb C.
        • Thompson P.
        • Spalding T.
        Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT.
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25: 1568-1575https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3683-8
        • Peña E.
        • Calvo B.
        • Martinez M.A.
        • Palanca D.
        • Doblaré M.
        Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study.
        J Orthop Res. 2006; 24: 1001-1010https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20037
        • Petersen W.
        • Forkel P.
        • Feucht M.J.
        • Zantop T.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Brucker P.U.
        Posterior root tear of the medial and lateral meniscus.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134: 237-255https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1873-8
        • Prince M.R.
        • Esquivel A.O.
        • Andre A.M.
        • Goitz H.T.
        Anterior horn lateral meniscus tear, repair, and meniscectomy.
        J Knee Surg. 2014; 27: 229-234https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360658
        • Shybut T.B.
        • Vega C.E.
        • Haddad J.
        • et al.
        Effect of lateral meniscal root tear on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 905-911https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514563910
        • Siebold R.
        • Schuhmacher P.
        • Fernandez F.
        • et al.
        Erratum to: Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 10.1007/s00167-014-3058-6).
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 3046https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3230-z
        • Steineman B.D.
        • Moulton S.G.
        • Haut Donahue T.L.
        • et al.
        Overlap between Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Meniscal Root Insertions.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 362-368https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516666817
        • Watson J.N.
        • Wilson K.J.
        • LaPrade C.M.
        • et al.
        Iatrogenic injury of the anterior meniscal root attachments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel reaming.
        Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 2360-2366https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3079-1
        • Yang N.
        • Nayeb-Hashemi H.
        • Canavan P.K.
        The Combined Effect of Frontal Plane Tibiofemoral Knee Angle and Meniscectomy on the Cartilage Contact Stresses and Strains.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 37: 2360-2372https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9781-3
        • Zantop T.
        • Ferretti M.
        • Bell K.M.
        Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: Intra-articular study in a goat model.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 2158-2166https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508320572
        • Ziegler C.G.
        • Pietrini S.D.
        • Westerhaus B.D.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 743-752https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510387511
        • Zielinska B.
        • Haut Donahue T.L.
        3D Finite Element Model of Meniscectomy: Changes in Joint Contact Behavior.
        J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128: 115https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2132370